Essay Writing Service

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

ConAgra Foods, Inc: Economic Analysis

Author: Artem Zaiets(36981)


This paper’s purpose is to look through and analyze the activities of ConAgra Foods within food processing industry. It will touch the areas of the financing of the company as well as those of the business strategies and compare the company’s major competitors’ operations over the past 5 years. The statistics will also project the expected future growth under the rate of 5% over a 3 year period and look at the sensitivity analysis. Using the projected data, this paper will also show the internal growth rate of the company as well as the external funds required for the future.


ConAgra Foods, Inc. is an American packaged foods company that is located in Omaha, Nebraska that was founded a whole century ago in 1919. The company produces and sells products under 27 different brand names, most of which are popular and known only within the North America. Some of ConAgra’s major brands include Hunt’s, Healthy Choice, Marie Callender’s, Orville Redenbacher, Slim Jim (snack food), Reddi-wip, Egg Beaters, Hebrew National, P. F. Chang’s, and Bertolli ready meals. The products of the company diverse from cooking oil to hot dogs, frozen dinners, peanut butter, hot cocoa and many more.

Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Find out more

As was mentioned earlier, the company’s brands are known mostly in North American, including Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, nevertheless, the company still competes with European and Asian packaging food companies in the market and holds a quite strong position in the list.

  1. Financial Strategy

There are many tools and ratios that can be useful in order to find out a firm’s financing strategy over a course of period. In this passage, I will be discussing 3 of them: debt to equity ratio, payout ratio and retained earnings during the period from 2010 to 2014, and will compare them with other major competitors that the company has in the food processing industry.

The first tool that will be used is debt to equity ratio. This ratio indicates the proportion of equity and debt that a company uses to finance its assets to know whether it is conducting a riskier but more profitable business or vice versa. From the chart we can observe the comparison of this ratio with 2 other industry-related companies (Appendix Table 1). As can be seen from the chart, over the course of these 5 years, the ratio for ConAgra Foods, Inc. jumped drastically from 0.7862 to 1.752 in December 31st of year 2013. This can be explained by the fact that the company decided that it did not have sufficient revenue in order to operate further, and as was mentioned earlier the higher the ratio is, the more risk the company takes but the more money it receives as a turn-over at the same time. We can observe the same situation with Kraft Foods, an American company which was founded in year 2012 as a grocery manufacturing and processing conglomerate. A new company has relatively ‘less’ to lose than an older one, especially when a company such as ConAgra Foods is nearly 100 years old. Indeed, in the short run, according to microeconomic rules of companies, the latter need to have as much revenue as possible in order to operate in the long run. That is why the ratio for the second company is relatively high. As for Nestle which was founded in year 1905 and that is headquartered in Switzerland, we can observer that the situation is rather more stable compared to the 2 other companies. In year 2012, it reached a maximum of 0.4494 ratio in debt to equity which is quite low considering this industry is capital-intensive.

The payout ratio, on the other hand, shows the amount of dividends per share to earnings per share that a company makes. For investors, the ratio can show whether the company’s dividend payments seem to be appropriate and sustainable or whether the company’s paying out more than it can sustain. New and-or fast growing companies usually focus on re-investing their earnings so the business can grow, and as a result, tend to have lower dividend payout ratios. Conversely, larger companies usually have a higher payout ratio. Let us analyze the data from Table 2 (Appendix Table 2).

ConAgra Foods company’s payout ratio during the period of 2010 to 2011 has been always higher than 40%, and in 2012 even reached 84.8%. This shows that the company decided to increase the relations with their shareholders, or increase the amount of people contributing to the company by having a more attractive dividend payment. As for the new company Kraft Foods, in 2012 the ratio was at 18.2% which is not surprising. However, the company in the next year decided to increase the dividend payments to 48.2%. The reasons may be the same as ConAgra Foods company’s and also that the company does not have much operating cost at this stage. Nestle in years 2010 to 2011 was quite low, but increased to a reasonable amount in the next years.

Yet another tool can be used in defining a company’s financial strategy and it is the retained earnings. Retained earnings are usually used to pay off debts and/or gain additional assets (Appendix Table 3). Table shows the relationship between the retained earnings with long-term, short-term debts, as well as non-current assets and stockholders’ equity for ConAgra Foods company. The short-term debt in the company is kept relatively low at all times in the company, which shows that it spends its earnings to keep them down. Non-current assets, however, get increased by twice as much in year 2013. The explanation for this may be that the company decided to increase investments for its many brands recognition, as well as some new equipment.

1.2. The relationship between the financing strategy and the business strategy

Since ConAgra Foods, Inc. has so many brands under its name, a wise strategy for the company would be to increase their investments on those brands that have the highest potential, make them more recognizable around the U.S. The company has, therefore, undertaken a few financial actions that would reflect on their business operations. An example of that is the dividend action. The dividend continues to represent one of the highest payout levels among consumer food companies today. As was shown earlier in the chart with the payout ratios of the company and its competitors, we could indeed see that the ratio was the highest for ConAgra Foods, Inc. Restructuring charges is the next strategy that the company recently implemented. The balance of this charge will reflect upon the volatile and non-volatile costs relating to the implementation of restructuring activities, including programs designed to reduce the company’s ongoing operating costs. In other words, the company also focuses on reducing operating costs. This does make sense, knowing that this industry is quite capital-intensive. The company also announced plans to divest its seafood and domestic imported cheese businesses.

1.3. Internal Growth Rate

The internal growth rate of a company illustrates the highest level of growth which is achievable by the company without obtaining external financing. The formula for calculating the growth rate is as following: IGR = Plowback ratio × return on equity × . The plowback ratio is simply 1 subtracted by the payout ratio (1 – payout ratio), and the return on equity is the net income divided by the shareholders’ equity (ROE = ). Using the latest financial data of the company for year 2014, we get that IGR = (1 – 0.527) × × =0.473×0.058×0.272=0.00746 or roughly 0.75%.

A conclusion of this is that without external financing, the growth rate of the company is mediocre. In case of any questions considering number (Appendix B Balance sheet of the company).

2.1. ConAgra Foods spreadsheet

Assumed growth rate 0,05 Comments Comments
Income statement 2014 2015 2016 2017
Revenue 17 702 600 18 587 730 19 517 117 20 492 972 5% increase
Cost of goods sold 13 980 000 60,4% of sales 14 679 000 15 412 950 16 183 598 5% increase
EBIT 955 400 1 003 170 1 053 329 1 105 995 5% increase
Interest expense 379 000 379 000 379 000 379 000
Earnings before taxes 576 400 EBIT-I.expense 624 170 674 329 726 995
Taxes 298 000 51,7% of EBT 322 696 348 628 375 856
Net income 315 100 EBIT – I.expense – taxes 301 474 325 701 351 139
Dividents 166 057 Payout ratio = 0,527 158 877 171 644 185 050
Reatined earnings 149 043 Net income-dividents 142 597 154 056 166 089
Balance sheet
Net working capital 1 588 400 1 667 820 1 751 211 1 838 772 5% increase
Fixed assets 15 123 600 15 879 780 16 673 769 17 507 457 5% increase
Total assets 16 724 000 17 547 600 18 424 980 19 346 229
Equity and liabilities
Long-term debt 8 767 600 8 767 600 8 767 600 8 767 600
Shareholders equity 5 258 500 5 401 097 5 555 154 5 721 242 Increase due to Retained earnings
Other liabilities 2 601 200 2 601 200 2 601 200 2 601 200
Minority interest 96 700 96 700 96 700 96 700
Total liability and s.equity 16 724 300 Equal to total assets 16 866 597 17 020 654 17 186 742
Required external finance 0 681 003 1 404 326 2 159 487 Total assets – Total liab. and s.equity

From this table we can observe how much external finance company needed to maintain future growth. It means that company will either sell equity or borrow debt to obtain extra cash for future growth. Required external finance was calculated, simply, by subtracting future total assets from future total liabilities and shareholders’ equity. In case of any questions considering number (Appendix B Balance sheet of the company).

Appendix A

2.1. Financing strategy

Table 1

DEBT TO EQUITY 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
ConAgra Foods (CAG) 0.6543 0.6183 0.7862 1.752 1.522
Kraft Foods (KRFT) N/A 0.0021 2.79 1.924 2.298
Nestle (NSRGY) 0.3249 0.3928 0.4494 0.3475 0.3024

The numbers were taken from December 31st of each consecutive year.

Table 2

PAYOUT, % 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
ConAgra Foods (CAG) 43 46.8 84.8 82.1 52.7
Kraft Foods (KRFT) N/A N/A 18.2 48.2 53.1
Nestle (NSRGY) 17 18.5 60.6 72.2 47.5

Table 3

Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Retained Earnings 4417 4854 4765 5130 5011
Short-term Debt 261 364 78 703 226
Long-term Debt 3226 2870 2859 8887 8768
Non-current Assets 7778 7509 8223 16026 15136
Stockholders’ Equity 4924 4702 4440 5264 5259

Appendix B

1.3. Internal growth rate; 2.1. ConAgra Foods spreadsheet

Balance sheet of the company

Current Assets
Cash And Cash Equivalents 183,100
Net Receivables 1,393,200
Inventory 2,292,600
Other Current Assets 361,900
Total Current Assets 4,230,800
Property Plant and Equipment 3,822,800
Goodwill 7,836,500
Intangible Assets 3,205,800
Other Assets 270,500
Total Assets 19,366,400
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable 2,416,400
Short/Current Long Term Debt 226,000
Total Current Liabilities 2,642,400
Long Term Debt 8,767,600
Other Liabilities 2,601,200
Minority Interest 96,700
Total Liabilities 14,107,900
Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock 2,839,700
Retained Earnings 5,010,600
Treasury Stock (3,494,400)
Capital Surplus 1,036,900
Other Stockholder Equity -134,3
Total Stockholder Equity 5,258,500


conagrafoods, (2015).Investor Relations and Investor Information | ConAgra Foods. [online] Available at:–Streamlined-Portfolio–Increased-Marketing-on-Key-Brands–Aggressive-Cost-Programs-and-Lower-Dividend-Shape-New-Financial-Profile-1008563 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2015]., (2015).Balance Sheet for ConAgra Foods Inc (CAG) from [online] Available at: [Accessed 29 Jun. 2015]., (2015).ConAgra Foods Inc (CAG) Debt to Equity (%). [online] Available at: [Accessed 29 Jun. 2015]., (2015).Nestle SA, NESN:VTX financials – [online] Available at: [Accessed 29 Jun. 2015]., (2015).CAG Balance Sheet | ConAgra Foods, Inc. Common Stoc Stock – Yahoo! Finance. [online] Available at: [Accessed 30 Jun. 2015]., (2015).CAG Income Statement | ConAgra Foods, Inc. Common Stoc Stock – Yahoo! Finance. [online] Available at: [Accessed 30 Jun. 2015].

Most Used Categories

I order from this writer for quite a while, so we are having the chemistry going on between us. Great job as always!
Laura C., March 2018
Wow, ordering from EssayHub was one of the most pleasant experiences I have ever had. Not only was my work sent to me hours before the deadline, but the content was absolutely fantastic! Would order from them again!
Daniel L., March 2018
Professional Custom
Professional Custom Essay Writing Services
In need of qualified essay help online or professional assistance with your research paper?
Browsing the web for a reliable custom writing service to give you a hand with college assignment?
Out of time and require quick and moreover effective support with your term paper or dissertation?